Over the last few months, the cost of coffee has risen dramatically. Since January, the average price of coffee futures on commodity markets has increased by more than 50 percent:





It's taken a while for this to be reflected in the retail price of coffee, because roasters generally have a few months' stock of beans on hand. But we're finally beginning to see slight increases in retail prices of coffee too.


Last month, according to the Consumer Price Index, the average retail cost of a pound of coffee in the US went from $5 to $5.20, an increase of four percent. The underlying trends driving this rise have experts predicting that retail prices will continue to increase, especially for high-end speciality coffee blends.

So what are the causes of this recent price increase?

Ultimately, you can blame two main factors: a severe drought that's currently impacting Brazil and the swift spread of a disease called coffee rust in Central America.

Brazil is suffering from a wicked drought




You might not know it — because Brazil doesn't produce that many of the high-end speciality coffees that have the country of origin on the label — but Brazil is a giant in the world of coffee production.

It's easily the number one country in terms of total beans produced, and accounts for about about a third of all coffee grown on the planet. It also produces about half of the world's arabica coffee — a variety considered to be higher quality than robusta, the other widely-grown type.

That's why this year's drought in Brazil has had such a dramatic effect on world coffee prices. Normally, the harvest period in Brazilbegins in May, but the drought — which some are calling the worst in decades — has led to severely decreased yields this year.

Some growers are reporting yields that are down 30 percent from last year. In some cases, coffee plants' berries are ripening as they usually do, but when farmers go to harvest, there are no beans inside.

In total, Brazil's 2014 production of arabica beans is projected to be 16 percent lower than last year's. Given Brazil's critical role in the world coffee market, this is a huge deal.

A coffee rust disease is infecting Central America

In Guatemala, Rigoberto Umul shows the effect of coffee rust on plants.




If you combined the small coffee-producing countries of Central America (Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica, and El Salvador) into one nation, it'd be second to Brazil in overall coffee production — and might be first in production of high-end speciality arabica beans.

But this year, a disease called called coffee rust is spreading across Central America, infecting plants in every country and driving down yields significantly. It's estimated to have caused more then $1 billion in damage this year so far.

"The fungus attacks the leaves," says Leonardo Lombardini, a plant scientist at Texas A&M. "It doesn't kill the plant right away, but the leaves fall off because they're infected, and the plants put out new leaves which then get infected. After several months of this, the plant ends up starving."

Even in cases where the fungus — which causes orange or yellow spots on the leaves before eating holes in them — doesn't kill the plants, it can reduce bean yields by infecting the coffee berries, ruining the beans inside.

The disease has been present in Central America since the 1970s, but scientists think the fungus has spread virulently due to unusually high amounts of rain during what is normally the dry season over the past few years. Increasing temperatures and other effects of climate change have also played a role.

"Locally, the coffee rust has been devastating," says Phil Arneson, a retired plant scientist who now tends his own small coffee farm in Honduras. "I had to cut down nearly half of my plants, and the remaining plants have lost many branches and will produce very little fruit."

The main weapon we have against coffee rust is the use of fungicides, but they aren't always effective and have other downsides. The chemicals are often too expensive for small-scale growers, and can't be used for beans intended to be sold as organics. What's more, scientists say excessive use of fungicides can be harmful to the people who harvest coffee beans, as well as the surrounding environment.


And things are only going to get worse




In the short term, there are a few reasons why you might expect coffee commodity prices to continue rising — and for this to increasingly affect retail coffee prices too.

For one, meteorologists predict that El Niño will return this year. Many project that itcould bring drought to coffee-growing countries in Central America, further reducing yields.

Another short-term problem is one that makes coffee prices volatile in general. Coffee consumption isn't very elastic, meaning that it doesn't respond strongly to price increases.

When other commodities get expensive, usage can be curtailed — if corn prices went up significantly, for example, Coke might use sugar or another sweetener instead of high-fructose corn syrup in its beverages. The reduced demand for corn helps slow the increase in the cost of it.

For the most part, coffee doesn't work this way. An estimated 54 percent of American adults drink coffee every day, and tea won't suffice. Coffee is an exotic plant that can only be grown in very specific ecosystems thousands of miles away, but we've come to see it as a daily staple, and many Americans who depend on drinking it will do soregardless of price increases.

There are also longer-term problems that might cause coffee prices to continue rising in the coming years. one is that substantial solutions to the problems of drought and coffee rust take time. Unlike say, corn, planting more coffee during the next growing season won't mean more beans are available at the next harvest — it takes several years for a coffee plant to reach maturity.

And even when it does, it might be struck by the rust fungus as well. As a solution, scientists are currently looking for and breeding rust-resistant coffee varieties (USAID recently donated $5 million towards this goal).

Still, there are even reasons to think that these efforts will be futile. "Coffee doesn't have a very broad genetic base," Lombardini says. "It originated from just a few plants that were taken out of Ethiopia a few hundred years ago, so it has a very narrow, homogenous genome."

This means that finding variations that might allow for rust-resistance will be difficult. Even if they're identified, a mutation in the fungus' genome could easily allow it to conquer the resistant plants. "My worry is that producers will over-plant this variety and when the inevitable mutant rust strain capable of infecting it arrives, we will be back towhere we are now," Arneson says.

And even apart from coffee rust, there are other long-term trends that suggest coffee prices will just continue rising. For years, coffee has been grown in developing countries and shipped off to wealthy ones, but the actual residents of those counties seem to be developing a taste for the delicious beverage. This could increase global demand.

More troublingly, scientists project that climate change could drive price increasesthrough a few different mechanisms. Coffee can only grow within a certain band of temperatures, so in Brazil, Uganda, Central America, and elsewhere, heat will reduce the suitable area. It'll also help pests spread, and extreme weather might increase the number of crop failures.

728x90



728x90


By Caity Peterson

You're hungry for pizza. Walking around the neighborhood, you find two pizzerias not far from each other. They're both selling pretty much the same thing - crust with cheese and tomatoes on top - and at the same price. But one offers you a free delicious ice-cold 2-liter soda to go with your hawaiian. That makes your choice easy, no?

Believe it or not, something similar is happening in Uganda. only we're not talking about pizza, and the choice is a bit more complicated.

The comestibles in question here are two of the country's most important agricultural commodities. one, coffee, makes up 20-30% of Uganda's foreign exchange earnings and creates a cash boom for smallholders once or twice a year. The other, banana, is the country's principle staple crop, providing a small, steady food harvest all year long. In fact, Uganda was the 2nd largest banana producer in the world in 2008, and the 11thlargest coffee producer.

By happy coincidence, both of these crops tend to grow at around the same altitude: from 800 to 2300 meters. Thus, considering growing human populations and farmers increasingly squeezed for space, it makes sense to grow them together, especially since coffee tends to produce more consistently when grown with a little bit of shade. Many farmers in Uganda are doing just that, intercropping banana and coffee to make good use of space in densely populated areas. Others are sticking with the old system or growing the two crops in separate plots, as used to be promoted by colonial extension services solely concerned with profits from the coffee cash crop and is often still promoted today, for apparent lack of a better option.

But which of these systems is actually the most beneficial for farmers? Until now, not much research has existed specifically targeting the relative advantages and disadvantages of different types of coffee growing systems. The result is that government agencies and other advisory bodies have trouble knowing what to promote, and farmers are even more in the dark.

Ongoing research by the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kampala, Uganda, in collaboration with other CGIAR centers (CIATICRAF, and CIFOR), has attempted to evaluate the benefits of different types of systems, including co-benefits for climate change adaptation and mitigation and implications for pest and disease incidence.
 They have found that banana-coffee intercrop systems have the potential to be the most beneficial for farmers because they leave the yield of the coffee crop virtually untouched, while providing a little something extra in the form of more food for their personal use. Essentially, by combining the two crops farmers are greatly increasing the total yield value of a single plot of land, even if the yield for individual crops doesn’t change much. Bananas are to coffee crops what our free soda is to pizzerias – it doesn’t change the pizza, but it’s a nice bonus nonetheless.

Furthermore, including bananas in the coffee system spreads the farmers’ risk. If one crop fails or is decimated by a disease, they can still get a harvest from the other. Ugandan farmers have reported that the shade from the bananas also decreases their coffee’s susceptibility to drought and extreme weather events due to climate change. The residues from the trees provide in-situ mulch which would otherwise cost them much capital and labor to bring in. They say bananas also motivate them to better manage their coffee crops during the first 3-5 unproductive years, because the bananas are producing even when the coffee is not. This is especially true for the female half of the community, which often doesn’t see the money from a coffee sale come back to the household but can use the banana harvest for home consumption.

There are trade-offs, of course. The intercrop system removes larger quantities of nutrients from the soil, and, in the long-term, coffee can eventually out-compete banana. The system can also require larger inputs of labor and capital at the outset. Accordingly, the success of intercrop systems will require identification of major production constraints – principally soil fertility – and the development of site-specific recommendations to address them.

Recently, the IITA team has been taking a more climate-centric focus to their crop system analyses, collaborating on the development of suitability maps for East African coffee crops, pests, and diseases and investigating the mitigation potential of the coffee-banana intercrop system. For more info on past and current IITA work in Uganda – and parallel projects on cocoa systems in Cameroon and Nigeria – check out the following resources:

See original story on CCAFs blog:  http://ccafs.cgiar.org/blog/uganda-coffee-and-banana-go-better-together


728x90

+ Recent posts