728x90

LVC, GRAIN, ETC Group, FoEI, MMM, CLOC, Re:Common | 14 September 2012 | Other publications

14 September 2012
 
 
우리는 유엔 식량농업기구(FAO)의 Jose Graziano da Silva 총장과 유럽부흥개발은행(EBRD)의 Suma Chakrabarti 대표가 공동으로 서명한 월스트리트저널 2012년 9월 16일자 논설에 충격과 울분을 느꼈다.1 그 기사에서 그들은 세계 식량생산의 주요 동력으로 민간부문을 받아들이라고 정부와 사회단체 들에게 요구한다.

구체적으로 동유럽과 북아프리카를 언급하면서, 이 두 국제적으로 영향력 있는 기관의 수장들은 세계적으로 민간부문의 투자와 토지수탈을 늘리라고 명확히 요구한다. 그들은 민간부문이 효율적이고 역동적이라고 하며 기업들에게 "토지에 2배로 투자하라"고 요청한다. 한편 그들은 농업개발에 "방해가 되는" 부담이라며 소농과 그들을 보호하기 위한 몇 안 남은 정책을 철회시켜 그들을 없애려 한다. 그렇게 하여, 그들은 대형 농기업의 성장을 촉진시키라고 정부에게 촉구한다. 그들의 논설은 9월 13일 이스탄불에서 열린 FAO와 EBRD의 공동회의에서 출간되었다. 이곳은 그들이 농기업의 의사결정자와 기업들의 가장 크고 중요한 모임 이라고 묘사한 곳이다.

FAO Director-General José Graziano da Silva (Photo: FAO/Ozan Kose)

FAO의l José Graziano da Silva 사무총장 (Photo: FAO/Ozan Kose)

Graziano da Silva 총장과 Chakrabarti 대표는 논설에서 농업과 식품에 관한 현실을 가리는 여러 편견에 치우친 주장을 한다. 그들은 러시아, 우크라이나, 카자흐스탄을 농기업이 1990년대 "황무지"뿐이던 이 나라를 "곡물수출국"으로 이끈 성공 사례로 지적한다. 그러나 그들은 이 세 나라의 공식통계를 보면 소농이 대형 농기업보다 더 생산적이라는 사실이 드러난다는 것은 밝히지 않았다. 

소농, 특히 여성농민은 러시아 농업생산의 절반 이상을 담당하지만 농지의 1/4만 차지하고 있다. 우크라이나에서 여성농민은 단 16%의 농지에서 농업 생산량의 55%를 생산하는 한편, 카자흐스탄에서는 토지의 절반을 차지하고 농업생산의 73%를 담당한다. 그 사실은 이들 나라를 그러한 소농이 먹여살린다는 것이다. 그리고 이는 전세계에서도 그러하다. 유럽연합과 콜롬비아, 브라질의 이용가능한 공식자료나 아시아와 아프리카, 라틴아메리카에서 수행된 연구에서 보면, 소농의 농업은 대규모 농기업보다 훨씬 효율적임이 드러났다. 

FAO의 사무총장이 주장한 바와는 반대로, 참으로 세계를 먹여살릴 능력이 있는 사람은 세계의 남녀 소농들이다. 농기업의 확대는 단지 빈곤을 악화시키고, 당당한 농촌 생계를 파괴하며, 오염과 환경파괴를 증가시키고, 노예노동의 재앙을 부활시키고 식량과 기후 위기를 불러올 뿐이다. 

사회운동과 세계의 소농들에게 FAO 사무총장이 소농의 농업을 파괴하고 토지수탈을 촉진하자는 말은 용납할 수 없고 이해할 수 없는 일이다. 이는 특히 비아 깜페시나와 여러 단체에게 토지수탈에 대항하여 지역사회를 보호하기 위한 FAO의 자발적인 지침을 만들고, Graziano da Silva 총장이 선거 기간 동안 소농의 농업이 지닌 중요성을 장려하고 실증하며 소농이 식량생산에서 중요한 역할을 해야 한다고 되풀이하여 농민단체에게 확인시킨 지 3년 만에 일어난 일이라 더욱 당혹스럽다. 

Graziano da Silva 총장과 Chakrabarti 대표가 던진 말은 무례하다. "돈으로 이 땅을 기름지게 한다"거나 "세계의 기아를 더 편하게 한다"와 같은 문구는 농촌 인구의 생활조건을 개선하고 기아를 근절하기 위해 엄밀함을 가지고 일하고 대형 농기업 회사로부터 독립적이며 유엔의 권한을 실행해야 할 FAO의 능력에 의심이 생기게 한다.

우린 FAO가 "국제 가족농의 해"라고 하는 것이 무슨 의미인지 궁금하다. 사무총장은 농업생산을 향상시키는 데 장애물이 되는 것이 "상대적으로 높은 수준의 보호, 적절한 관개의 부족, 작고 비경제적인 규모의 농장이다"라고 했는데 말이다. 탐욕스런 투자자들의 요구와 이윤을 위한 이러한 전망과 FAO의 비굴함은 최근 농민단체와 FAO 사이에 일어난 화해 분위기를 깨버릴 것이다. 그리고 왜 FAO는 다시 한번 다국적 은행과 기업만 배불리고 세계 식량위기에 대한 근본적인 대응으로 소농과 가족농을 장려하는 굳세고 효과적인 행동에 대한 제안을 성장시키지 않는지 의심을 불러일으킬 것이다.2 만약 공업형 대농장으로 그들의 땅을 변형시키는 일이 성공한다면 소규모 가족농은 어디로 갈 것인지 걱정스럽다. 

FAO가 사명을 저버린 문제 이외에, 대형 농기업에게 농업을 맡기고 토지수탈에 대한 투자를 촉진하여 이윤을 얻는 주도적 역할을 하려고 하는 EBRD에게도 깊은 우려를 표한다. EBRD의 태도는 현재 북아프리카로 작업 영역을 확장하여 무엇보다 더욱 위험하다.

농업과 지구를 위해 필요한 것은 Chakrabarti 대표와 Graziano da Silva 총장이 제안한 맞은 편에 있다. 인류와 기아로 고통받는 사람들은 세계 인구의 절반을 대표하는 소농의 농업을 가능하게 만드는 농촌 지역의 농경문화가 필요하다 -- 소농의 농업은 더 효율적이고 생산적이기 때문이고, 적어도 세계 식량공급의 절반을 생산하고 농촌 지역에서 고용의 대부분을 창출하기 때문이며, 행성을 식힐 수 있기 때문이다. 

소농과 토착민들의 생계와 그들의 식량생산 체계는 극소수의 엘리트 집단을 위한 막대한 이윤의 새로운 원천이 되도록 희생시킬 수 없다. 우린 농촌 사람들의 손에 땅과 영토를 되돌려줄 포괄적이고 효과적인 농업개혁이 필요하다. 토지의 상품화와 수탈은  중단되고 파기되어야 한다. 우린 농기업이 필요치 않다; 우린 위엄과 신망을 지닌 더 많은 지역사회와 더 많은 소농과 토착 가족농을 필요로 한다.

소농이 세계를 먹여살린다 !
농기업이 그것을 수탈한다 !


2 See, for example, James Cusick, "We'll make a killing out of food crisis, Glencore trading boss Chris Mahoney boasts", The Independent, London, 23 August 2012,http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/well-make-a-killing-out-of-food-crisis-glencore-trading-boss-chris-mahoney-boasts-8073806.html; Tom Bawden, "Barclays makes £500m betting on food crisis", The Independent, London, 1 September 2012,http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/barclays-makes-500m-betting-on-food-crisis-8100011.html; and Peter Greste, "Rising food prices hit Nairobi slums", Al Jazeera, Doha, 6 September 2012,http://www.aljazeera.com/video/africa/2012/09/201296195748591887.html.


728x90
728x90

By Kevin Robbins

On Sunday mornings at the Dupont Circle FRESHFARM Market in Washington, D.C., you can find bouquets of fresh flowers, bundles of brussels sprouts, and buckets of local apples. And you can also find a man in a white butcher’s smock surrounded by tables of ice and local meats labeled “Designer Line of Fine Swine” and “Grass-kickin’ Chicken.”

Bev Eggleston discusses raising animals humanely. (Photo credit: Gourmet Magazine)

Bev Eggleston—founder of EcoFriendly Foods—invites wondering customers to sample his latest selection of cured meat. He starts out simple: “Have you ever tasted heritage pork?” But before you leave, he’ll get serious: “So why do you think Obama didn’t mention agriculture in his State of the Union address? How can an ‘America Built to Last’ forget about its farmers?”

Eggleston’s grass-fed, family-farm-raised meats are a favorite with farmers’ market shoppers and dinners at some of the best restaurants up and down the East Coast. He owns and operates the first of what he hopes to be many multi-species, certified humane, USDA inspected processing plant in Moneta, Virginia. He works with small, local farms to source, process, and distribute local beef, eggs, lamb, pork, and poultry.

Additionally, Eggleston works with organizations in the profit and not-for-profit sector to promote family farming and sustainable agriculture. He lobbies government locally and nationally and last year joined the Advisory Committee for AGree, a new initiative focused on long-term agricultural, food, and rural policy issues.

This is the first of a two-part interview with Eggleston.

What was the genesis of EcoFriendly Foods? How did you go from farming in Virginia to processing and selling Virginia-farmed meats across the East Coast?

I got into farming after being sick and learning about detox [how what we consume effects our health] and the ecology of [human] physiology. I was interested in the importance of the how and why behind the plants and animals we grow. I got involved in eco-friendly farming which helped both with my healing and my personal growth.

In 1991 I met Joel [Salatin of Polyface Farms] and started learning from him. Back then, we believed that we were farming the right way, but we could produce more than we could sell to folks who came to the farm. We needed to rmake the food more accessible to more people. We needed a bridge from the meadow to the mainstream. We needed to figure out how to get free range chickens into Chipotle, for example. Eventually EcoFriendly was my attempt to build that bridge.

What is ecological profitability? Why is it important to you and your business? What do you think the American food system could learn from this concept?

It’s simple: if it makes ecological sense and it makes profit, then it’s ecological profitability. And it has to be both. We could just be ecologically sound or just economically viable—plenty of people have done that. But ecologically sound while economically profitable? That’s like a lost art form. Thankfully, we’re starting to remember.

Focusing solely on profits and maximizing output—with no regard for the earth, the animals, or the quality of the food we’re putting into our bodies—this kind of thinking has made a mess of our food system and of farming in America. I believe we still have some tough times ahead, but I’m optimistic. I know there’s a new crop of farmers out there who want to learn how to grow food in a way that is ecological and profitable.

What is conscious consumption and why are you a proponent?

People who consume consciously are more aware of their food dollar, of where their money goes, of the power it represents. Consumers can vote their beliefs with their dollars. And the industry knows this, which is why they try to keep consumers in the dark. But the more consumers demand, the higher the aspirations of the American food system will have to be.

Today, there’s no integrity in the American food system. I can tell you this: they’re [the food industry] not focused on your health, your well-being. We have to go to the store and spend half our time scrutinizing labels. That’s crazy!

But we’re learning, and our learning curve is rising fast. As we create more market demand, the industry listens. Right now, we are a niche market. But when we’re successful, there won’t be anything niche about this market. We’re helping the market understand which direction we should be moving in, a better way of growing and selling food.

Are we more powerful as a collective than we are as individuals? The answer is yes, always. Collectively we need to spend our money in ways that will make a difference for ourselves and the environment.

You sell much of your products to restaurants, working with what you have described as “enlightened chefs” who value a combination of sustainability and superior quality. What role do these chefs play in changing our food system.

These chefs are rock stars. They’re heroes. They’re choosing high quality, sustainable products and rejecting much cheaper alternatives. The small family farmer can’t sell to most of the grocery store chains. And they can’t sell to most restaurants. But they can make a living selling to these chefs.

And they’re educating the public. At the farmers’ market, we connect with people every week. But these chefs amplify that message. They reach out to new dinners every day.

The chefs are important, but they can’t do anything without a good front of the house—waiters and waitresses who know how to tell the story. Diners have questions about what tastes good, what’s raised right. This empowers the wait staff to help diners make good, informed decisions. I need the front of the house to deliver the message which is why I spend time working with them when I drop off product for the chefs.

I’ve asked this animal to give its life up to provide sustenance, and I take that fact very seriously. With the help of enlightened chefs and a front of the house that is educated and excited, I know that diners will taste something delicious, learn something new, and feel good about the decision they made. And I’ll know that the animal I delivered did not die in vain.

You predominantly work with small, family farmers and pasture-raised heritage breed animals. Why are they important to you and what role do they play in a sustainable system of agriculture?

 

Heritage breeds teach us how animals really want to live and you can’t beat their quality or adaptability. Actually, small family farms and heritage breeds are very similar: they both need marketability or they’ll be extinct. Honestly, my biggest commitment to rare breeds is the rare breed of farmer that is young, small, and family-oriented. And I’m willing to do whatever it takes to help those young farmers keep their farms or find farms to call their own.

They’ve got to figure out how to make it in the new farm economy and I think that what they really need to do is think way outside of the box. If you ask me who is the ideal farmer, I say young and hard-working—even urban transplants, people who are new to farming. They’re tabla blanca, clean slate, someone who isn’t prejudiced by the old way of doing things or their fears about tomorrow.

But they’re also going to need some help. The government has to even the playing field. Federal subsidies have propped up large, unsustainable commercial farms and given them an unfair advantage. They’ve sold their products for artificially cheap prices. But this has proven to be bad for the environment, bad for animals, bad for consumers, and bad for family farms.

As opposed to just regulating us, the government needs to invest in us and encourage development. Let’s make sustainable farming a profitable enterprise. We also need new policies. President Obama has mandated that allUSDA programs must emphasize local food. But the USDA has no idea how to answer that call. They barely understand the questions that call creates.

All of us in AGree have been studying or working in agriculture for several decades. It took a long time for the system to spin off in the wrong direction. It’s taken a long time for us to investigate and understand the problems this has created. And it will take a long time for us to craft something new. In AGree, we’re looking at American agriculture 10 to 20 years from now. We know there’s a lot of work to do. But we’re hopeful.

On a practical level, we need to share stories of success so that others will get inspired to change their ways, to get involved. Replicated small successes can make an enormous impact. Part of my generation’s work is to inspire and recruit the next generation of farmers.

To learn more about EcoFriendly Foods’ visit their website or Facebook page.

To read more about family farms and farmers’ markets see: Feeding Mouths and Empowering Communities in Brazil,Family Farmers Get Their Day In Court Against MonsantoConnecting Farmers to Markets in Mali, and New Report Urges the Government to Invest in Farmers Markets.

Kevin Robbins is a research intern with the Nourishing the Planet project.

To purchase your own copy of State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet, please click HERE. And to watch the one minute book trailer, click HERE.

728x90
728x90

전 세계에서 소농이 인구의 70%에게 먹거리를 책임지는 반면, 공업형 농업은 단 30%만 공급할 뿐이다. 그러나 역설적으로 세계의 빈곤층인 280만 명 가운데 대부분이 농민이다. “마지막 농부”라는 다큐멘터리는 어떻게 소농이 세계화와 공업형 농업으로 전화하면서 빈곤에 빠져 고통을 겪는지 보여준다.

인도네시아의 환경운동가 Hira Jhamtani 씨는 “Agriculture란 단어에 culture가 있지요, 안 그렇습니까? 그건 실제로 문화적인 방식으로 무언가를 한다는 겁니다”라 한다. “그러나 우린 공업으로 만들어 버렸다… 다국적 기업이 소농의 역할을 앗아갔다. 모든 곳에서…유럽에서도, 미국이나 인도네시아에서도, 가족농은 대형 기업으로 대체되었다”고 인도네시아, 과테말라, 부르키나파소에서 3명의 농부와 그 식구들의 일상을 담은 다큐멘터리의 감독 Giuliano Girelli 씨는 말한다. 이 다큐멘터리에서는 농업다양성의 감소, 토양비옥도의 저하, 식량불안, 줄어드는 수입에 직면한 그들의 투쟁에도 관심을 기울인다. 또한 전 세계에 걸쳐 세계화의 영향에 관한 전문가의 지적도 담고 있다. 


신자유주의, 세계화 그리고 소농


728x90
728x90

An entire way of life is rapidly dying right in front of our eyes.  The family farm is being systematically wiped out of existence in America, and big agribusiness and the federal government both have blood all over their hands.  According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States has fallen from about 6.8 million in 1935 to only about 2 million today.  That doesn't mean that there is less farming going on.  U.S. farms are producing more than ever.  But what it does mean is that farming is increasingly becoming dominated by the big boys.  The rules of the game have been tilted in favor of big agribusiness so dramatically that most small farmers find that they simply cannot compete anymore.  Back in 1900, about 39 percent of the U.S. population worked on farms.  At this point, only about 2 percent of all Americans now live on farms.  Big agribusiness, the food processing conglomerates, and big seed companies such as Monsanto completely dominate the industry.  Unless something dramatic is done, the family farm is going to continue to be wiped out of existence.  Unfortunately, it does not look like things are going to turn around any time soon.

The way that the farming industry is structured today, it is simply not economically feasible to operate a small family farm.  According to Farm Aid, every week approximately 330 farmers leave their land for good.

Many old timers are trying to hang on for as long as they can.  A very large percentage of family farmers are in their fifties, sixties or seventies at this point.  Today, only about 6 percent of all farmers are under the age of 35.

Most young people these days are not too eager to choose farming as a career.  A lot of young adults that grew up on family farms have decided that investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in a business that requires you to work 12 hours or more per day most of the year for very meager wages is simply not worth it.

In recent years, many family farmers have been forced to find second jobs in order to support their families.  Many farm families are constantly on the verge of financial ruin.  It is a really tough life for many of them.

Sadly, less than 25 percent of all farms in America bring in gross revenues in excess of $50,000.  The following comes from the EPA website....

It has been estimated that living expenses for the average farm family exceed $47,000 per year. Clearly, many farms that meet the U.S. Census' definition would not produce sufficient income to meet farm family living expenses. In fact, fewer than 1 in 4 of the farms in this country produce gross revenues in excess of $50,000.

On top of everything else, the federal government and many state governments just keep endlessly piling more rules and regulations on to the backs of farmers.

Big agribusiness has the resources to deal with all of these regulations fairly well, but most family farms do not.

With each passing year, the farming industry becomes even more centralized.  If current trends continue, big agribusiness will eventually control nearly all of it.  The following is from the EPA website....

By 1997, a mere 46,000 of the two million farms in this country accounted for 50% of sales of agricultural products (USDA, 1997 Census of Agriculture data). That number was down from almost 62,000 in 1992.

In certain industries the amount of consolidation has been absolutely stunning.  For example, between 1970 and today the United States has lost 88 percent of its dairy farms.

Another factor that is shaping the farming business is the incredible power that the giant food processing conglomerates have accumulated.

Today, there are 10 corporations that control most of the things that Americans eat and drink on a daily basis.  If you doubt this, just check out this chart.

The giant food processing conglomerates have a massive amount of influence over how food is grown in the United States today.  Small farmers that try to go against the tide often have a very rough go of it.

That is also true when it comes to seeds.

For example, approximately 80 percent of all corn grown in the United States is grown using seeds that have been genetically modified by Monsanto.

If you want to try to defy companies such as Monsanto, you are playing a very dangerous game.  The predatory business practices of Monsanto have been well documented.  Monsanto has taken countless numbers of farmers to court, and they are absolutely ruthless.

Plus, it certainly does not help that there is a constant revolving door between Monsanto and federal government agencies.  If you doubt this, just check out the chart about Monsanto on this page.

Amazingly, in spite of all this there are still some small farmers that are able to overcome all of these obstacles and run successful businesses.

But that is where the federal government comes in.

In recent years, the federal government has become absolutely obsessed with going after small farmers.

For example, a recent Food Freedom News article detailed what the feds have been doing to Randy and Karen Sowers.  They were keeping their cash deposits under $10,000 so that they would not have to fill out a bunch of paperwork, and the federal government came down on them like a hurricane....

“Structuring,” explains Overlawyered.com, “is the federal criminal offense of splitting up bank deposits so as to keep them under a threshold such as $10,000 above which banks have to report transactions to the government.”

While being questioned, the Sowers were finally presented with a seizure order and advised that the feds had already emptied their bank account of $70,000.  The Dept. of Justice has since sued to keep $63,000 of the Sowers’ money, though they committed no crime other than maintaining their privacy.

Without funds, they will be unable to make purchases for the spring planting.

When a similar action was taken against Taylor’s Produce Stand last year, the feds seized $90,000, dropped the charges, and kept $45,000 of Taylor’s money.

Knowing that most farms operate on a very thin margin, such abuse of power wipes out a family’s income, and for a bonus, the feds enhance the monopoly power of Monsanto, Big Dairy and their supply chain.

At many other small farms across America, the feds have conducted military-style raids at the crack of dawn over the smallest infractions.

Some examples of this were detailed in a documentary entitled "Farmaggedon".  The following is a short trailer for that film....

The sad truth is that the federal government has been using your tax money to go after small farmers in absolutely vicious ways.

For example, the feds raided one Amish farm at 5 AM one morning.

So what was the big crime that the feds were so concerned about?

Well, the Amish farm was selling raw milk.

Oh the horror!

The feds seem content to leave big agribusiness pretty much alone, but they are constantly going after small farms in hundreds of different ways.

Did you know that the Department of Labor is instituting new regulations that will ban children from doing many kinds of farm chores?

Just another way to kill off the family farm in America.

America is changing, and not for the better.

Just like the middle class, the family farm is heading for extinction.

Eventually, the big corporations and the federal government will have near total control over food production in America.

So what do you think about all of this?  Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below....


728x90
728x90




여성은 아프리카에서 주요한 식량 생산자이고, 그들은 계속하여 자신의 가족과 지역사회를 위해 식량을 생산하기 위하여 싸우고 있다. 2011년 2월에 "우린 해결책이 있다: 아프리카 가족농 기념행사(We are the solution: celebrating African family farming)"라는 운동이 세네갈 다카르에서 열린 World Social Forum에서 시작되었다.  Food First delegation는 이 역사적인 행사에 증인으로 참석했다.

소농 조직, 농민 연맹, NGO의 폭넓은 연합으로 결성된 그 운동은 녹색혁명에 반대하고 생태농업과 가족에 기반한 농업을 추구한다. 농촌 여성은 그 운동을 조직하고 실행하는 데에 지도적인 역할을 담당하고 있다. “다카르Dakar 선언”은 서아프리카의 6개국에서 온 12개 아프리카 농촌 여성의 협회의 지도자로 구성된  이 운동의 여성 모임에 의해 2011년 2월 7일 발표되었다.

DOWNLOAD DECLARATION


728x90

+ Recent posts